Journal requirements decoded: a practical compliance playbook

Reading time ~12 minutes · Updated August 8, 2025

Journal requirements decoded: scope, limits, figures, data, ethics
TL;DR: Most delays come from mismatched category, missed limits, image specs issues, under-specified statistics, absent data availability, and incomplete ethics or author info. This guide turns a journal’s instructions into a checklist, a compliance matrix, and a one-day sprint.

1) Scope and article types

Editors filter by fit before they read prose. Pick the correct article type with matching aims, evidence, and length.

Checklist

  • Article type matches the contribution (Original Research, Short Communication, Methods, Data Note, Review, Perspective).
  • Scope statement uses the journal’s language (target community, organism/system, methods family).
  • Abstract aligns to the article type (structured vs unstructured; limits respected).

2) Length and structure limits

Respect limits early so figures and methods survive later polishing.

Common limits

  • Words (total or main text).
  • Figures and tables (total count).
  • References (max count or per type).
  • Supplementary items and formats.

Structure rules

  • Section order (IMRaD vs journal-specific).
  • Heading levels allowed.
  • Abstract, keywords, highlights, graphical abstract requirements.

3) Figures, tables, and image specs

Image failures waste weeks. Prepare export presets once and reuse.

Figure specs to set

  • Resolution: 300 dpi (raster) for print; line art often higher.
  • Dimensions: width in mm/px for single vs double-column.
  • Formats: TIFF/PNG (raster), PDF/SVG/EPS (vector).
  • Color: RGB for online; CMYK if the journal requires print CMYK.
  • Fonts embedded; panel labels readable at print size.
  • Captions self-contained; define symbols and abbreviations.

Export tip: save named presets per journal, e.g., JNL_Single_85mm_300dpi.

4) Statistical reporting that passes first time

  • Report n, effect size, and variation (CI/SD/SE) per result.
  • State test names and two-sided/one-sided choice; check assumptions or use robust alternatives.
  • Adjust for multiple comparisons when relevant; declare the plan (preregistered vs exploratory).
  • Provide software and version; include code or a DOI where allowed.

5) Data, code, preregistration, and availability statements

Many journals require machine-readable statements. Prepare the text once and reuse.

Required statements

  • Data availability (repository, accession, embargo with end date).
  • Code availability (repository, license, tag or DOI).
  • Preregistration or protocol (registry, link/DOI).

Template (fill brackets)

“Data supporting the findings are available at [repository] under accession [ID]. Analysis code is released at [URL/DOI] under the [license]. The analysis plan was preregistered at [registry] ([ID]).”

6) Ethics, conflicts, funding, author IDs

  • Human/animal ethics approvals and consent language as required.
  • Conflict of interest statement (none or disclose specifics).
  • Funding statement with grant numbers; role of funder if any.
  • Author identifiers (ORCID) and contribution taxonomy (e.g., CRediT).
  • Permissions for reused figures/tables where needed.

7) Open access, APCs, and waivers

Plan budget early. Many publishers have institutional deals or waivers.

  • Open access route (gold, hybrid, green) and embargo rules.
  • APC price, discounts, institutional agreements, or country waivers.
  • License options (CC BY, BY-NC, etc.) that match funder mandates.

8) Submission package and portal gotchas

  • Cover letter: fit statement, main claim, delta vs prior work, disclosures.
  • Highlights, TOC blurb, keywords: match journal taxonomy.
  • Supplementary files labeled and cited in the text.
  • Metadata consistency: title, author order, affiliations, corresponding author email.
  • Presubmission inquiry if fit is uncertain; include 150-word pitch plus two similar recent papers.

Compliance matrix (copy-ready)

Use this as a living checklist during formatting. Keep sentences brief in the table; details remain in the manuscript and captions.

Journal: [Name]      Article type: [Type]      Version: [Date]

LIMITS
- Words: [max]          - Figures: [max]            - Tables: [max]
- References: [max]     - Supp. items: [rules]      - Abstract: [limit/type]

IMAGES
- Size: [single/double column widths]   - Resolution: [300/600 dpi]
- Format: [TIFF/PNG/PDF/SVG]            - Color: [RGB/CMYK]
- Fonts embedded: [Yes/No]              - Captions: [Self-contained]

STATISTICS
- n + effect size + variation: [Yes/No]
- Test names + assumptions: [Yes/No]
- Multiple comparisons: [Method/NA]
- Software + version: [List]

DATA & CODE
- Data statement: [Link/DOI/Embargo end]
- Code statement: [Link/DOI/License]
- Preregistration/Protocol: [Registry/ID]

ETHICS & DISCLOSURES
- IRB/IACUC: [ID/NA]
- Consent: [Included/NA]
- Conflicts: [None/Details]
- Funding: [Grant numbers]
- ORCID/CRediT: [Completed]

SUBMISSION PACKAGE
- Cover letter: [Done]
- Highlights/Graphical abstract: [Done/NA]
- Keywords (journal taxonomy): [Done]
- Metadata consistency: [Checked]
- Presubmission inquiry: [Sent/NA]
        

One-day compliance sprint

  1. Hour 1: Lock article type and collect a recent accepted example to mirror structure.
  2. Hour 2: Apply limits (words, figures, tables). Cut or move content to Supplementary, not Methods.
  3. Hour 3: Export all figures with journal presets; fix caption completeness.
  4. Hour 4: Statistics audit: add n, effect size, variation, test names, and assumption notes.
  5. Hour 5: Draft data/code/ethics/conflict/funding statements; insert DOIs and IDs.
  6. Hour 6: Build cover letter and portal metadata; verify author order and affiliations.
  7. Hour 7: Final pass on abstract, title, and keywords; confirm taxonomy match.
  8. Hour 8: Package check in the portal with placeholder files to catch format errors, then submit once.
Need help? We can convert a journal’s instructions into a project plan, export figures to spec, and return a submission-ready package with track changes and a compliance matrix. Format my manuscript

Tags: Journal requirements Formatting Peer review